SOME PHONETICS PROPERTIES COMPARATIVE ANALYS IN EASTERN ANATOLS DIALECTS

Abstract

There are many phonetic differences in dialects, they do not see in the literary language. These differences are numerous in the Eastern Anatolian dialects and differences are analyzed comparatively in this study with Azerbaijan Turkish. We can see in the Turkey Turkish many excerpts from the harmony of thick and thin celebrities and that they obey the law of integration in the Azerbaijani language. For example: İn Turkey Turkish (TT) avare< in the Azerbaijan Turkish avara, (TT) badem<(AT) badam, (TT) cevap<(AT) cavab, (TT) ezan<(AT) azan, (TT) helal<(AT) halal, (TT) kale<(AT) gala, (TT) selam<(AT) salam. It seems that connects to the vowel harmony as in the Azerbaijan Turkish in the Eastern Anatolian dialects citation famous similarities result. As in the Azerbaijan Turkish in the Eastern Anatolian dialects thickness and finesse the citation of the famous similarities of the words appear to be linked to the famous harmony. For example: İn the Erzurum dialect: (Shenkaya - İn the Olur Turkmen dialects): amanat<emanet, gayfa<kahve, habar<haber, mayana<muayine. İn the Erzincan dialect: adat<adet, manavra<manevra, atash<atesh, hayrat<hayret, satan<zaten. İn the Kars, Ardahan and İghdir dialects: cahal<cehal, guluba<kulube, satan<zaten, atash<atesh, saghabi<sahibi (sahibi). İn the Van and Bitlis dialects: habar<haber, bakhcha<bakhche, menfeet<menfaat. İn the Elazıgh dialect: tana<tane, barabar<beraber, ecele<acele, mekeme<mahkeme, masala<mesala etc.